< 0725 | 0726 | 0727 >

#n01

Roland Mann

To be clear, in Pyefleet creek the landscape is shifted by 90 degrees clockwise.

Ronald Green

That's a relief. I thought you had reached another part of the multiverse.

Existence is indefinite shiftiness, i.e., the indefinitesimal triadically (in terms of 1. self-deception, 2. fallacy and 3. mental disorder) jumping the utter nonsense of the way and reason between times and places.

Any multiverse (incl. multiculturalism) is such ecstatically farcical disintegration as if integration, next-tier.

Roland Mann

Pierre Rousseau Having relaxed my grip on the tiller I'm free to say that I'm delighted with the notion of 'disintegration as if integration.' It is wonderfully accurate and concise and I should like to use the expression.

You have my permission.

Everything is word as such. The notion of "the subject characterized" in terms of external or internal "force" or "meaning" is nonsense, and intersubjectively, power and control are nonsense, i.e., disintegration as if integration.

Everything is word. The notion that something other than word determines word, or that word can be further explained by demonstration or evidence as any notion as if it it is not word, is the bullshit. Everything is word, also God. It is not God that cannot be explained (in terms of the bullshit notion in chant or "practice" reconfirmed by God's existence that any is-ness can be explained beyond what it is as "it is"), but word. But that is the universe (as if in or not in the world in duplicitous partnership with word diminished), where word can or cannot be explained beyond word. Therefore it is not that word can or cannot be explained. The notion of explaining something beyond what it is, is self-contradiction. "Everything is word" is not in the slightest "word is everything," as if to hold someone responsible for their statement as fundamentalism, to their disintegration (as if it is integration).

Ronald Green

Where is "word"?

That is the nonsense question that solicits the bullshit, "action."

The notion that there is or is not common ground (the notion common ground) is duplicitous or deeper,... criminal organizational triadic bullshit.

Note the idea that I am saying there is not common ground between us, is the error common ground. It it is steeped in and bristles with the universe as a construct supposedly of human self-deception, fallacy and mental disorder, both in it and as it. It is self-contradiction necessarily as self-deception, fallacy and mental disorder.

Ronald Green

So you didn’t write the above?

Conversation is holy, a place where one truly exists, a Synagogue.

The idea "action," e.g., "write" is the error. Not to write is the error. Not to believe in God is the notion "God."

Ronald Green

Pierre Rousseau What do you mean? Is that an answer to my question?

It is not "an answer" or "not an answer" to your question. Individuals or groups cancelled or excommunicated, even just partly, are the mortar of the archetypal mythological construct in the terms that bind the Synagogue to itself. They are its scapegoats. Its other.

"What do you mean? Is that an answer to my question?" is a loaded question, in terms of the idea that things exist and are in action, or that a world beyond word explains word.

Ronald Green

so what you wrote does not exist and neither does Pierrre, who wrote i?

Pierre Rousseau By “loaded”, do you mean it requires an answer?

"Where" is word. Anything about how or why word is, is the contradiction or nonsense existence or action as some kind of function or personification (pseudo-functionary or person) qualifying word.

Stupidity is the idea that humans individually or in groups are stupid. Such humans are the scapegoats that cement the term together.

Again, as the bullshit that it too, like a person functions.

#n02

#n03

#n04

#n05

#n06

#n07

#n08

#n09

#n10