< 0530 | 0531 | 0601 >

#n01

That a thing means something is the error and bullshit that it is not meaning.

#n01.01

Bullshit is meaning as not meaning to the extent that, again, according to the functionary "state" of things, it conjures up meaning from somewhere holy beyond meaning or not meaning, something that does or has meaning that the meaning or lack of it is about.

#n01.02

So, bullshit is bullshit to the extent that it is self-contradiction, i.e., syntactic, semantic and pragmatic dualism.

#n01.03

Any extent that someone or something, the piano and the music play (or do, or have) each other, is the holy bullshit that is the abyss.

#n01.04

Any phenomenon, physical or metaphysical explained as cause or caused, or memory or remembered is dualistic meaning-as-the-not-meaning bullshit that it is about something else.

#n02

That demonstration (action or showing) is the answer, is meaning as meaning denial (the abyss).

#n02.01

What is now action or showing is no such thing to the extent that the ecstatic story — in terms of love and war necessary to facilitate and force the facilitation and force bullshit that it transcends meaning — is that it has the explanatory power that transcends meaning.

#n02.02

The farcical questions-and-answers why and how are self-contradictory meaning as such bullshit meaning transcendence.

#n03

20210530#n04

Bullshit is not meaning?

Deborah

Bullshit is meaning as not meaning to the extent that, again, according to the functionary "state" of things, it conjures up meaning from somewhere holy beyond meaning or not meaning, something that does or has meaning that the meaning or lack of it is…

So, bullshit is bullshit to the extent that it is self-contradiction, i.e., syntactic, semantic and pragmatic dualism.

20210607#n05

#n04

#n05