.01

Being is the prime error
Journey—Origin, Destination
Purpose—The question 'why'

Not that being is wrong and not being is right. They're one error. The paradoxical dichotomy 'it's there or not' is the error. Such error is the question 'why' in corruption of the differential similarity-and-difference point-motion analog word that everything is, i.e., the question 'what' it is.

The logical ultimacy 'of' being is the holy farce 'enlightenment', or what stands in technocratic constitution of metastasized meaning as zombified 'wokeness' and the pathetic 'empowerment' of the unenlightened and powerless meant 'to be' narcissistically tearfully, fearfully TOGETHER, slave not to conservative leadership equanimity, but to the 'progressive' gang or mafia-psychopath authority of integral farce riddled to holy nothing, the abyss.

The error is whether something exists or not.

.02

"Though definitions and techniques of mindfulness are wide-ranging, Buddhist traditions explain what constitutes mindfulness such as how past, present and future moments arise and cease as momentary sense impressions and mental phenomena." Wikipedia: Mindfulness.

The error is mind, namely that existence is not point-motion, but the personalized and personified points-integration (like past, present and future) primarily IN which, and hence secondarily (teleologically personified) AS which entities purposefully (con theorizing, modeling or conceptualizing 'mind') journey, research, explore or move.

.03

.04

.05

.06

.07

.08

.09

.10