Does compassion implicitly or explicitly condone suffering?—NE

Jeff Suskin essay — https://medium.com/the-ooda/the-etymology-of-suffering-1d330ddfd94a

SdW: What is not explicit is action

One might hope that those with compassion would aim to relieve suffering, not stand idly by feeling sorry for someone and doing nothing, but 'being compassionate' has no requirement to take action, it seems. According to Google, compassion literally means “to suffer together", which is rather odd.

The self is barely layered as the other suffering in action together

Compassion for typically the self as the other as the self does require action by the most demonic spirit imaginable, posing as your own choice about the life of your own body. E.g., suffering together, you as forever your unborn child.

The bullshit explanation existence is all about suffering together

The grassroots of the bullshit ground explanation "existence" is all about the perpetuation of suffering or being the subject and victim, with compassion, together, and to under-stand esoteric elitist newspeak or independent (alternative) objective facts, i.e., knowledge about existence (science).

Jeff Suskin: Suffer means under or carry

“Suffer” has two roots. One is “Sub” which means “under” and can also mean “inferior” (like subcontinent, subordinate, etc), The second part is “Ferre”, which means to carry or bear. Essentially meaning to “undergo” or “endure

Agency is the suffering, "existence," i.e., "to be or not to be."

To be an agent (ferre or phor) is to be or not to be under the magic spell of the ultimate bullshit, the explanation "existence." Hence to have to ever more escape it, through one's embodiment of the magic master and its master magic, "Spirit," "soul," or "psyche."

So, implicit or explicit?—whatever autocratic bullshit works.

Conclusion: Passion: to suffer. Compassion: to suffer with.

The SPCA, unwittingly and not, is all about exacerbating dogs suffering.

It stimulates "oh, so cute" dog brood parasitism no end, with cycles of formal and informal puppy mills, dog abandonment and death.

Humans are in that same cycle, in many different ways.

To the left (2nd tier autocracy), saturation violence and passion are ground

To the second-tier autocracy, chaos (saturation-violence) is the new war, and order (saturation-passion) is the new love.

So, the new horror is not so much war, as chronic chaos-for-order by new ways of the idiotic propaganda of suffering together.

The left (the holiness of the ultimate socialist revolutionary end by absolute mayhem, parading as social justice) does not want the pressure released. It wants it contained so as to continue to escalate.