Blog | Word | Books | Book-i | Fallacies |
The Transmogrification of Man 1006 — Word of the Day I'm trying to imagine thinking before knowing. How would that be possible? Where would thinking come from? A blank? Where anything comes from is always the question why (it exists) The question why follows but itself, as the expansion of the question why, by the inevitable contradiction of the non-answer answer how. The maximum awe-inspiring contingencies for integration God (everything) and farce (nothing) are its ultimate resolution, namely the swooning bullshit explanation, “existence” (x). ...i.e., word under assault by transsexual infinity metastasis
0744 Ronald Green “The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed without changing our thinking.” Einstein. I would rather put it as “The world as we have created it is an expression of our knowledge. It cannot be changed without changing what we know.”—Ronald Green 20221116 0401 US Central Time “Perhaps I should say ‘knowing’, rather than ‘knowledge’.” Ronald Green, 20221116 0606 Thinking is to knowledge as process is to system. Same difference. The change to knowledge and system is from the question why to the question how, i.e., from intelligence to artificial intelligence cybernetics. The change to knowledge and system is also from individual origins and causes as if existence already established as ontology, to the collectivistic self-organizational automation of epistemology, i.e., from duplicitous autocratic hegemony to outright mendacious technocratic truth administration.
0816 Our emotional and rationalizing “human” attachment to tribe must be transmogrified (since, like Ronald Green’s self also as other, it consists of a real inside, the world and a meta outside, knowledge of the world). It is the reason for the new waves of brute totalitarian pharmakon, i.e., the manufactured need for physical, mental and spiritual “sickness” and “vaccination.”
0821 “Transmogrification” is key, namely not mere transformation, but technocratic transformation by wizardly artificial synthesis necessarily mass marketed with criminal organizational farce.
0834 So, “Science” and “human speech” ought to be subject to prescription by the wizardly system of knowledge, i.e., ministry of truth. Therefore the chronic admonishment to best go to some arbitrary pit of mendacity as if it’s mother earth’s tree of life for “learning” what the truth is.
0845 “Transformation in practice” is utterly violently transmogrification “because” (by its own traditional why-logic of origins) existence is the contradiction nonword word. Its persistence is the sacralization of brutal irony as junkie, zombie and crazie change.
0849 The abysmal idiocy that “man” is beyond evil (more evil than evil) is the faddish lubricant of the erroneous explanation, “existence”
0854 The supposedly instinctive “good,” i.e., the collective unconscious as it plays out is normalized and naturalized as never before. It is no noumenal instinct. It is sheer artificial intelligence (as summarized in the few comments above) and the metastasis of word.
0912 As “in existence” (as out of to-be, is) everything is hidden, mystical and sacredly esoterically maximum. But no man is adequate before such awe(someness and fulness). Therefore here on the banks of the tumid river, to be a true man is to increasingly shed tears as if being uplifted to sing and dance together while being played and laid prostrate and trampled to dust. Pierre Rousseau oh SURE! modern society is a Hellhole. You used the term "uplifted". That is what is required. Hence the constant reference to elevation. After all> Hell lies below..underneath...buried Rise above is the message Wrong. The message is that it requires empowerment to rise above... last post on this page 1051 below.
0928
0944
1004 Pierre Rousseau it is FAR worse. (from a psychological standpoint) Man had a direct relationship with the ecosystem He had "Direct Experience" thru rites of passage which aligned his sensibilities in accordance with practical responsibilities. The most overwhelming challenge for modern and post modern humans is "alienation" This is inarguable.
1300 History (time) is the error existence, namely nonword word, and as such is the systematic dismantling of word instead deposited as the world, in escalating punctuated equilibrium a geography of feces, i.e., incrementally and in so-called developmental stages.
1307
0937 That “existence” is the ultimate contradiction converging to nothing as if it is everything, is borne out by the absolutely farcically mendacious nature of normalized and naturalized “education,” “news” and “advertising,” day after day, evening after evening. Speech has transmogrified into Newspeak, as prescribed by the Ministry of Truth. And further hammered in by systematic regimens of psychological and psychiatric healthcare. The bullshit story of being together surrendering to the stardust is sheer diversion, obfuscation and ultimate facilitation of the abyss.
0942 As for Ronald Green's conclusion that nothing is an impossible thing. Yes, except that It is perfectly logically what escalating farce ultimately is.
1006 — Word of the Day I'm trying to imagine thinking before knowing. How would that be possible? Where would thinking come from? A blank? Where anything comes from is always the question why (it exists) The question why follows but itself, as the expansion of the question why, by the inevitable contradiction of the non-answer answer how. The maximum awe-inspiring contingencies for integration God (everything) and farce (nothing) are its ultimate resolution, namely the swooning bullshit explanation, “existence” (x). ...i.e., word under assault by transsexual infinity metastasis
1051 How renewed (empowered) is not the answer. It is traditional wow (at power) transmogrified. The what of advertising includes how. Both 1) what is (explicitly not word, which is what something is) and 2) how it is, are the It, namely the emotional or rational magical substance of existence, both wondering at It and about It, so advertising is the peddling of bits as supposedly integral parts of the esoteric Magic, for instance the ambivalent Nike ad, “Just Do It.” Robert Kegan on the (earthly awesome and awful—my comment) “human” condition (but no such thing, rather the mayhem of the error of the explanation, “existence” (x) which necessarily stands on maligning the species man as fallen or just idiotically “human”): “The root of admiration is *wonder*, as the Latin (*mirar*, to wonder) suggests. And ‘wonder’ is as two-sided, as dialectical, as ambisexual as human beings themselves. ‘Wonder’ is ‘wondering at’ and ‘wondering about.’ ‘Wondering at’ is watching and reverencing; ‘wondering about” is asking and reckoning. ‘Wondering at’ is Eastern, receptive, contemplation as an end in itself; ‘wondering *about*’ is Western, acting upon, a means to an end. ‘Wondering at’ is aesthetic, the inspiration of the humanities, *anima*, blessed by a feminine god; ‘wondering about’ is analytic, the inspiration of the sciences, *animus*, blessed by a masculine god.” |