< 0404 | 0406 | 0407 >

The brave new commons of chaos-is-order is criminal organization

Any explanation existence is the fallacy, self-deception and disorder of action by mind and a humanity being accused of it.

The answer to embrace chaos as if it is order, is the brave new world of its criminal organization.

The Brave New World of Total Slavery

Woke is the new enlightenment in the error of there being or not being someone saying this and hearing this, or anything, by which the brave new slaves are perfectly silenced into the puppet empowerment of loudly proclaiming, "I am being myself," and " I-don't-care fuck you," as the new revelation of the verb.

The silence is anything but about each other. The silence is about the abysmal disorder (of frivolously "fact-checking" the world) as the sheer criminal organization of politically expedient lies as if it is the Ministry of Truth and Newspeak.

And as if the litany of empowerment is not criminal support of the new criminal organization.

Brave New World by Any Criminal Means Necessary

The 2020 election had to be stolen after subversion (70y), Trump-smearing (4y) and mass-genocidal psyop (1y) failed.

No horror is more criminal than the terrorism that abortion is a woman's choice.

Even if the horrific explanation of word as thus mere meaning is existence, it remains all about words, including the terrorist assault on word that the error is word, that is, as mere words.

The secondary target is humanity. The primary target is word.

Abortion as the criminally organized assault on the woman's body namely the terrorist lie that abortion is a woman choice, is humanity as the secondary target.

Empowerment (by one's own choice) is the mayhem of junkies, zombies and crazies.

What power is so terrible that it sells the abortion of one's own body, i.e., one's child, as one's "choice?"

The most brutal criminal organization.

Is a theory of everything equal to what everything is?

After a bit of simmering from the prism of x point-i is either nothing or the one and only theory of everything. Leaning more towards the latter.

Of course. Every trick is involved. The second view is that if point-i, i.e., that everything is word, it follows that point-i is also that its author is saying that word is everything and is thereby narcissistic, solipsistic and guilty of every other fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder, and conceitedly doing the buffalo dance.

A theory of everything = what everything is. The idea that word is everything is not the theory of everything.

Where does x draw its power from?

Existence (x) draws no power (or not). Power is the same bullshit as existence, namely the bullshit answer to how and why.

X is all about power, which it draws from being vague. Re: ooo.

Continuing first item tomorrow: 20220407#toc-1