Point-i | Blog22 / 1229

Last entry yesterday: 1228#t1718
ราล์ฟ โอเตล

Pierre Rousseau you seem to have the solution in the box i.e. everything is word. And no one seems to grasp it so it fits some of Roland's criteria. The only criteria it doesn't fit is that there is any compelling reason to want to understand it. That would at least give it traction. Or is it that not to-exist means that there can't be any benefit to understanding it? No joy, no laughter, no eureka moment that is one of the requirements in Roland's experiment?

1229#t1223
Wrong that point-i is "not joyful."

The problem with to-exist (currently normal and natural) is that joy (+ or -) is necessarily pharmakon, i.e., rhetorically human-crazie, dialectically human-zombie and logically human-junkie sensationalistic, until the characterization "human" is as good as nothing and transhumanism (blissful universal death) is the answer. Joyfulness or mindfulness is sensationalistic yin yang paradox veering into a dead end. Its negative component is 100% in play.

1229#t0350
Roland Mann

Pierre Rousseau The moment you have continuity you have agency. 'Strength' is nonsense *unless* there is a stage for it. Everything is nonsense without that stage, but to say "everything is nonsense" involves standing on that stage. There are no clouds in An Atmosphere, no waves in Sea. And yet it rains, and ships get wrecked.

These are two completely different but interdependent scenarios; each rests upon the other.

But it is not a problem. All this stuff is The Future. There will always be a future whilst we anticipate it.

1229#t1237
Roland Mann, Continuity is nonsense. Point-i is the answer. It does not even have to encapsulate anything, it is the point that everything is word, i.e., everything is WHAT it is. While time is unnecessary it certainly is something, and like everything is word.

1229#t1245
The logical ideals of validity and strength are a litany of fallacies, inductively leaning on the notion that humans approach unity ignorance (compared to whatever unspeakable Thing "The Word"—Authority—is, formerly "existence"), and thus "human" is riddled with crazie-rhetorical mental disorders and zombie-dialectical self-deceptions. Why (in terms of that, how and why it-is) the world is a cacophony of love-and-hate.

1229#t1246
It is a cesspool of fake-continuous contradiction and everyone is pointing fingers at each other.

1229#t1247
And all manner of twittery together covers it up.

Like joyfulness and Eureka moments.

1229#t1252
Roland Mann

Pierre Rousseau "Continuity is nonsense"

1229#t1305
Rhetoric is about the audience (the collective of set up crazies via the mental disorder of the error mind), not the stage. Self-deception (dialectic) is about the stage. And fallacy (validity and strength of logic) is about the action.

1229#t1441
Facebook does not update comments, and I think it is deliberate, so as to spread trans-everything confusion.

1229#t1447
Continuity is both continuity and discontinuity. They are both ontological terminology and both nonsense, i.e., the nonword word contradiction of making The Word humanly impossible, but certainly not cosmologically.