|
Blog | Word | Books | Book-i | Fallacies |
#t0612 The idol is per definition the false icon. The ad hominem of points-of-view is as never before the idolatrous life of mutual projection and transference in the new artificial intelligence world of psychologism. The false (contradictorily inverted to accommodate “God’s existence”) religious variation of the explanations “existence” and “agency” typically states: “the idol is a false god, as the icon is the presence of the true god” Albeit steeped in the contradiction “existence,” that is the religious convention. Idol is per definition the name for the false icon. “As a first approximation these [icon, index and symbol] are as follows: icons are mediated by a similarity between sign and object, indices are mediated by some physical or temporal connection between sign and object, and symbols are mediated by some formal or merely agreed-upon link irrespective of any physical characteristics of either sign or object.”—Terrence Deacon Convention is that everything has a name. Furthermore, it stands in terms of word (symbol). What is anything but convention is that therefore it is that name. It is word. “Points-of-view” is semiotic sign-object dualism nonsense. In that nonsense the idol is already a regenerate icon or a regenerate index, for the icon and the index are by SYMBOLIC convention the nonword-word contradiction supposedly in the world of objects-and-subjects, i.e., “existence” with “agency” and “property.” The idol is the error, “existence,” namely the icon (and the index) as not word In Peircean semiotics (vs. Saussurean semiology) the three kinds of signs are icon (image), index (categorical list) and symbol (common convention). The error that it is anyone's opinion or point-of-view, that is, that things (someone and opinion) are doing and having each other, is the idol, “existence,” namely the error that the icon is no symbol (word) and also that the index as field to the icon, is no symbol. The dualistic sign is the swooning bullshit that is the mayhem Umberto Eco with artificial and natural signs is an even worse confusion in terms of normal and natural, i.e., non-linguistic and natural based on “human learning” to overcome “natural human” junkie fallacy, zombie self-deception and crazie mental disorder. Personal development is not progress. It is the soul-deconstruction, the psyche. The psyche is to ultimately define man as degenerately “human” namely properly “transhuman” or “together” prostrate to “empowerment” for the most efficient artificial intelligence genocide. |