|
Blog | Word | Books | Book-i | Fallacies |
Comments on THE presupposition, i.e., "infinity meta" is "existence." Existence is the presupposition in the sense that it sets up a dualism explaining "meaning," then relegates it in relation to its own erection, as if it is beyond such thereby minimized, demonized and denied "meaning." And ones who are agents "doing" and "having" such "meaning" are "'bisexual' humans." Supposedly ever more constrained... Hence trans-sexualism and transhumanism are the same thing: artificial intelligence. "Empirical existence." Sic. Laying out a process. Cybernetics. You become only what you negate — in, to or as the explanation, "existence." What is the error of the explanation "existence" is your person determining your philosophy? It's how and why you are set up "human." It is the story that you and your functional parts exist and are agentive, a process, systematic. There's not time OR space. Of any kind. It's not Overman. It's Man. "Human" in the sense of Fallen is the error, "existence." So, the paradox of pain is wrong, extremely complex, stretched out and so on. Meaning. Yes. Everything is word. No pathos necessary. Whatsoever. The problem of the concept, "existence" is that it cannot be demonstrated as more than a concept. |