• View
• Edit
• History
• Print

#t0831
However much we spew newly cliched Madame Bovarian farce,… Madame Bovary — Flaubert

Re. p.77 Nothing Matters, a book about nothing — Ronald Green

Ronald Green, 20221124#t1050

However much we make ourselves small by knowing as little as possible in terms of “the world,” i.e., with as much uncertainty as possible in our relations with it and as it, until the uncertainty is the sacred covenant of the commons itself, namely until our massively mutually dissociated psychologically projected and transferred empathy is the simultaneous transhuman singularity of utter Nietzschean super compulsion and Hegelian super fusion empowerment,…

… however much the farce “nothing” it is, the error is “existence,” the contradictory explanation of profuse wordiness that it and we are and are not “mere” word.

#t0925
“Wordiness” is the nonword word contradiction, "existence

Wordiness is deliberately nonword word, namely anything but the word that everything is, as if everything is instead something that is something's everything, namely the duplicitly artificially shifting (rolling) “e-mergence,” “ex-istence.”

So "existence" is exactly the metastasis, namely the singularity of the mere wordiness that is becoming what everything is.

#t1003
The empowerment of the psyche

The “empowerment” of one’s “psyche” as absolutely minimally contributing to the intersubjective field of its integration is the ultimate proselytization of the swoon and bullshit, “existence.”

#t1015
“Wordiness” is the nonword word contradiction, “existence” (x)

2ND VERSION TODAY, 20221125

Wordiness is deliberately nonword word, namely words that are anything but the word that everything is, as if everything is instead something that is something's everything, and that words are inadequate reference to the duplicitly artificially shifting (rolling) “e-mergence,” “ex-istence.”

So, existence is the holy contradiction that is the metastasis, namely the singularity of the mere wordiness becoming what everything is.

“Mere” words are the words best referencing the mystical world of “existence.” The more they are capable of reflecting the “nothingness” of “existence,” i.e., an approachable absence, the more they are representative of the infinitely derivative-dynamic past that is with us, the more valid, enlightened, or woke they are.

#t1150
The “human” death-drive “instinct”

“Life-and-death” and the “human” instincts and drives it represents are the contradiction most mysteriously peddled as blissful incompleteness (nothingness or mindfulness) the worldly and heavenly paradox “to be.”

“Existence” is as and in each other both word-word and nonword-word as the explanation for words-categorical definition, i.e., what something is. Whether inside or outside, It is the ontological, epistemological and cosmological twists and turns of the that, how and why “it is.”

Such explanations are that “humans” are full of shit, namely full of junkie fallacies, zombie self-deceptions and crazie mental disorders. However, such explanations are themselves the magical bags of shit.