Blog | Word | Books | Book-i | Fallacies |
Word is not anything but that everything is wordPoint-i is that if everything is word, any statement that word is anything other than that everything is word, is 100% contradiction. "IS" That A is B is not the ambivalent "is," either 1) = or 2) ∈, as it would if it had to be consistent with "existence" (x), i.e., with object permanence, any whatsoever. It seems that even with Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (consistent with 1st order logic), nth-order logic (or "dimensionality") yet, as nothing but more "hidden" 1st order logic — with mathematical grandiosity (magically) springs from it, i.e., as the 100% fog to chronically suspend as cover up that the logical contingency to explain word, the nonword word "existence" (x) [with object permanence] is 100% contradiction. |