The idea that everything is mnemonic is the systematic absence of word (meaning).

Yesterday, If x, is everything a mutherfucking joke? Like pharmakon...
https://point-i.net/Blog22/0910#toc-1

In an absurdist universe everything is a joke played on mortals by the gods (to paraphrase King Lear).

Richard Soloway

The universe is the bullshit-swoon of man set up as "human," as the myth, "existence"

The explanation "existence" is the error that necessitates the chronic farce of bullshit-swoon, i.e., the dense parade of fallacies, self-deceptions and mental disorder of archetype mythology of man set up as "human" to accuse each other of, submit each other and dominate each other, which is thereby, "reality." The earthly mayhem is not Nature or God's wrath, but the myth, "existence."

Pharmakon is relentlessly metastatic cancer.

Interpretation as the "most appropriate" pharmakon of onto-theology is onto-theology.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmakon_(philosophy)#In_post-metaphysical_philosophy

“[O]ne cannot talk with impunity of interpretation; interpretation is like a virus or even a pharmakon that affects everything it comes into contact with. On the one hand, it reduces all reality to message – erasing the distinction between Natur and Geisteswissenschaften, since even the so-called "hard" sciences verify and falsify their statements only within paradigms or pre-understandings. If "facts" thus appear to be nothing but interpretations, interpretation, on the other hand, presents itself as (the) fact: hermeneutics is not a philosophy but the enunciation of historical existence itself in the age of the end of metaphysics”—Gianni Vattimo

Only if x, philosophy is therapy (of the cybernetic interior as never before truly enunciating "existence") rather than discovery (of the universal exterior). The nexus is 1) junkie fallacy, e.g., administered by knowledge like psychology as the subversion of word. Only thereby “is there” 2) meaning-corruption, i.e., the zombie chant of self-deception in the intersubjective fields of all things as “psyche” and 3) chronic reapplication of mental disorder, i.e., the synthetic farce (techne) that the error “mind” is.

Existence is Nothing as the inversion of meaning

That what everything is, is also everything is the error of the sensationalistic dualism, "existence" which is the impossibility of itself as nevertheless the truth, and by such utterly holy megalith, its absence instead the impossibility.

The sensational explanation "existence" is the beckoning of the abyss.

Stop: 21:45

That we're going somewhere at all is the sensationalism, "existence," i.e., Nothing as if it is everything.

Stop: 22:31

And thus our prostrate geometric orientation towards the sacred rages on, as the technocratic confusion, "existence," about who is privy to the sacred.

Ronald Green, you blatantly use "existence" as the sacred ground (space) as if more than a thereby "mere concept" and anything else is irritating.

To say there is nothing sacred about your subject matter is the rendering of "existence" so sacred as the geometry of the various strains of nothing, it is taboo to mention it in that capacity.

To say "existence" is your sacred in the coinage of nothing, time and existence itself, is the ultimate profanity exactly from the vantage point of that holiness.

"Using it in [mere] language is a problem" is another way of saying "existence is sacred, language cannot touch it."

Fake media Petland is Shorthand chanting For solidland alpha.