< 0512 | 0513 | 0514 >

“Existence” is the infinite rumination of shit

The error is the dualism, 1) existence and 2) knowledge about existence (cosmology, ontology and epistemology), i.e., how and why things are and word is, instead of what things are, namely that everything is word and that existence as the extra-wordy explanation what word is, is the infinite rumination of shit.

With breathless reveal, are you not perhaps swooning before revelation?

Oh, it's revealed because... it is what was predicted from the modeling based on Einstein's theory.

The breathlessly revealed as perhaps but revelation

The breathlessly revealed as perhaps but revelation is about the Almightily holy farcical infinitudes of fast and loose intersubjective fields for the conflation of accuracy (significant representation), precision (chronic confirmation) and resolution (egoistic focal resolve) in "humans" as creatures set up in the collective litany of the quickest of quick scapegoat archetypes for any error or mayhem, via their souls or psyches prone to prostration, in terms of virtually singular fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder in the endless determination of "existence," hidden or revealed as the revelatory explanations of "'human' meaning."

It's not someone's denial, it's the error, "intelligence."

Point-i is the point that existence or agency is wrong explanation for word, of any so-called whole.

The explanation that things have or do each other (and are to blame for any resultant error) is artificial intelligence as the new bullshit Super God and its Darwinian cybernetics of gossip (diversion, cloak and facilitation of empathic twittery in being tearfully grateful to its Superman-meme empowerment), is itself the vast system of wrongness.

Empirical reveal is revelation

GALACTIC BLACK HOLE TECHNICOLOR DREAMCOAT

Existence and agency is the virtue and folly of durable category NE

Yes, the idea that word defers to differentially and self-referentially revealing itself is x as the constant search for hidden divinity whereby at every word-stultified collective resolution of the intersubjective field one man’s virtue is another man’s folly.

The error that is the mayhem, is that man naturally exists and evolves

The error that is the mayhem, is that man naturally exists and evolves (systemically develops or changes), and knows about existence.

As such, as ERROR he is always a single point of knowledge about existence faced with "all existence" as the infinity in all directions, similarly evolving, and in those terms is nearly completely ignorant, i.e., as object, "subjective" and thus is the animal, "human," an animal for its denial of simply innocently "being," is the sheer egoistic id of subject/object dualism and far more animalistic than any animal.

Hence the bullshit that "the other," but most of all from the perspective of itself as subject, looking at itself as subject-object, and thereby not the self as subject (as such looking and otherwise cognizant or sensible) is to blame for the chronic mayhem.

Excellent point. Natural law vs positive law = Kegan’s developmental stages of scapegoating man.

That everything is existence and knowledge about existence is the error

That everything is existence and knowledge about existence (cosmology, ontology and epistemology) instead of word, is the error.

“Grit-and-grace” is the bullshit of servicing The Man

“Grit-and-grace” is the traditional bullshit of servicing The Man, next-tier—far worse than anything before.