• View
• Edit
• History
• Print

Existence necessarily is sheer mysticism and therefore the über fact

The notion that existence now is wrong, yet existence past is right is utterly preposterous simplistically complex trickery perpetuating the already abysmally mystical bullshit explanation wordlessly as fact.

The past, given the indefinable “potential” underlying it, we are utterly subjective about it, therefore it is existence.

The singularity, artificial intelligence is man as humanity (x) utterly demonized, minimized and denied.

The singularity, artificial intelligence is man as humanity (x) utterly demonized, minimized and denied.

Does Hebrew have something to do with it?

Why? Does French?

The religiosity of secularism

0417#toc-1 Ehyeh asher ehyeh, (I am that I am, i.e., A is) is the error existence-movement (x).

The main question here is, “If God has nothing to do with it [the epistemological hierarchies of existence], does language, and here specifically Hebrew have something to do with it?”

The question is in the context of my questions under the link above about the CULTURAL unity of the first concepts of WORD CREATION, “existence” and “God” as in the New Testament of the Bible, John 1. It concerns the verb “to be” about your comment that in Hebrew its present tense exists, but that there is no verb form for it, although in Classical Hebrew there is a present tense form (sort of).

You also said I could make of that what I will [“go ahead”] and proceeded not to answer my follow-up questions.

Now I think it is a very important point, because the secular connection between God and the general militaristic political hierarchy of agency (with correction from continuous-gossip to punctuated-war) smacks of religiosity, as it is nearly completely theater, as in rhetoric, the production of personal effect.

My questions were about your notion (as I see it) that things are not mere words, yet that change is not just another thing that "is," thereby approaching fixity, like the past approaches, but never reaches the present, and that the most vivid or concrete existence is the paradoxical contortion of some subjective-objective integration of differentials of whatever is on the cusp of now.

So, given your salient fact about existence (in the rhetorical political sense) that someone is the one in question, yet not God. in other words that anyone would be wrong to extend “existence” (what something is) to beyond the past into the present and future. So, is the Classical Hebrew present tense verb form to the English present tense verb form what the derivative is to the point? Is the Modern Hebrew therefore true to “the mysticism of existence” as anything but present (tense)? Is it like “change” i.e., naturally, as law, to any [magical] order?

Is it not true that no matter how deep the rabbit hole of any such exponential orders of personal existential reality goes, the same magical trick, the derivative of Zeno or Gödel, “change” ties it all together so tightly that it virtually already is [NOW] artificial intelligence singularity? Like any mere human words, beyond any mere human grasp

Triggering by personal practice archetypes

Note that my comment in the main thread, The religiosity of secularism, is long before the last comment, in anticipation of the very high probability of the latter, given the highly weaponized state of personal practice archetypes. My deep stuff. Don't touch it.

Man is not to blame for such devastating triggering. But as mythological archetype we are named, "agent." We are not man, but humanity. What is the mayhem, is the horrific confusion of the abysmal error that we are humans, i.e., agents, each responsible for the infinite riddles of our own supposedly oh-so-human fallacies, self-deceptions and mental disorders in the unique practice of our own existence.

The slur, “human” next-tier is the confusion.

It's uncanny HOW and WHY, nevertheless as the universally wrong explanation that someone's doing it, is the slur “humanity” taken to new heights.

Man as "humanity" is being screwed through the ears as a safe haven of personal practice for the bullshit to continue.

Everyone is critically comprised, uh-oh, Freudian slip of compromised. The error is universal.

Man, as “humanity,” is being screwed through the ears

The error is agency, and hence that it is yours, and I, as if drawn by bright light, is another pathetic human being not to be messing with it. Yet, the social construct is such that some mystical authority is given free reign to screw its already tragedy-steeped subjects (namely every slave, element to the set, humanity) even further through the ears.

The general flood of mainstream propaganda weakening man is artificial intelligence.

Not surprising how facebook accentuates your statement, "I don't know why you're attacking me." It stands out like a sore thumb that such headlining serves the general flood of mainstream propaganda weakening man as mere humanity and will not stop before man [in terms of the error of being (humanity)] is whatever comes just before nothing.

NE, re. T-Mobile 5G Business NEWEST TV commercial “ musical style “
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYA3QEcLK6Y

Elon Musk is no human. He is x-man.

The man to dismantle the bullshit, x, that man is tragic and pathetic, i.e., "humanity."

That man is humanity is the error God and existence (x), which is the idea that, whether God exists or not, humanity is a demigod, utterly in the paradoxical nonsense that word is everything, but that human words approach nothing compared to it, and therefore (by the holified farce of paradox) that humans are virtually nothing.

Hence artificial intelligence is its paradoxical inverse, the singularity.

→ https://point-i.net/Blog22/0505#toc-1