re.
1227#t1238 Roland Mann
Pierre Rousseau There are no distinctions to be made in an analogue context.
1228#t0734
Roland Mann No, everything is word. That making or not or induction (context) is the issue, is the error that things are distinguished as The (Unspeakable) Word or in the context of Its supposed differentiation.
What things are is exactly what they are, as word. They are not after the fact that, how or why they are, even if That is unmentionable, i.e., that we cannot make distinctions in the context of its context.
1228#t0744
The ultimate horror is that as archetype mythology extensively, intensively and entensively (as supposed sign) in terms of words as if on matters beyond words, artificial intelligence (2nd tier error) has usurped The Word (made flesh, 1st tier error), but not in a religious sense at all, but as the ultimate disease, metastasis or trans-everything.
1228#t0747
Or the cybernetic judgment of all men. Literally the time of the Orc.
1228#t0759
So, the only thing that is wrong is that man has chronically been accused as the self-fulfilling prophecy of being but human. And by such complete error he is now the disease and by the long march through the institutions centered in establishing violence in children seduced by virtual reality games, has no choice to blissfully become transhuman, i.e., dead.
1228#t0816
The further cosmological (if existence) context beyond the apparently analog context is not indistinguishable. But it is turtles all the way down, (the nonsense, “infinity”). Thad Roberts also absorbs such further seductive induction as negligible measurement error made deduction in physics by digitally (deductively) concluding with 11 dimensions instead of 4. Whenever we name anything measured, we are naming the supposedly unmeasurable analog implied within it.
1228#t1006
Roland Mann
Pierre Rousseau, Well that depends on what 'Word' means.
To me 'Word' implies some kind of sameness, and thus has no place at all in an analogue; but could very well be considered a basic requirement in a digital format, in the same sense as a bit rate.
1228#t1012
Roland Mann, “Word,” as in “The Word” is the idea that “the analogue” as if “beyond words” determines “the digital,” that it determines distinct things not as what everything is (that they are word), but as mere words.
1228#t1015
I suspect that when I say that everything is word, you think of it in an ontological sense, that well, if everything is word it follows that I am claiming that word is everything. It is the projective inversion of the idea that the analogue is beyond distinction, and the reason is that the error is sheer linguistics, including the chronic scapegoating that man as but human is responsible for it.
1228#t1017
I wrote "analogue" in recognition of your English bent.
1228#t1021
So AI cybernetics in effect is the error that some unspeakable "Authority" (The Word), and The Word is with Him, albeit perfectly secularly dispersed throughout, cybernetically is a kind of super in all directions ministry of truth.
1228#t1022
Again the resultant hyper-metaphysics is not religious. It is abysmally just words, but in utter denial of it.
1228#t1023
Artificial intelligence IS the nonsense The Psyche.
1228#t1039
Same and different are things (words). It is as qualities of things that they are error that has to be allocated in personifications who if they are a person or persons have to thereby be scapegoated.
1228#t1044
Thus, (as the error that the logic, dialectic and rhetoric that, how and why any A is, is) artificial intelligence and The Psyche are the same swooning bullshit.
1228#t1112
When this was The Investigation (now Point-i), the conclusion was that everything is a continuum, a phenomenon but in a secondary sense most closely defined as somehow a fluid dynamic, or more accurately a fluid kinematic. However, it soon became clear that any kind of agency is the error of (being) nonword word.
1228#t1118
Is there some "differentiating something" for want of a word, behind what anything is (as distinction in but not as the continuum) persisting due to some unknowable quality of the continuum?
1228#t1119
About 7 years ago you called it "the differentiator."
1228#t1401
An analogue is something comparable to another in terms of some kind of differentiator unknowable in terms of words or thought. "A is B" (what A is) is thereby eliminated. Yet, that any A is B (as the common category that B already is, that very instance) is the very thing that symbol is, which is what everything is, i.e., word... wrongly "meaning," because meaning is referential or ententional, i.e., sign or semiotic.
1228#t1402
The idea that that implies that word is everything, is the impossible position for any "human" man to have unless he goes speechlessly trans, as the new New Age "Practice," namely mastery over Unspeakable Authority, i.e., artificial intelligence, The Psyche, and The Word.
1228#t1403
"Word" is that which we would have, had we been able to grok the truly mere "human"-word transcendent iconic or indexical analogue.
1228#t1406
However, we do not, which is the prescription for the death of man from on high as not even having to be just human, but to be transhuman, i.e., dead.
1228#t1312
Roland Mann
It's morning on 1st January 2023. You wake up, stretch and swivel out of bed ready for a new day, a new year. But something catches your eye. Lying at the foot of your bed is a small cardboard box. You pick it up, mystified. On it is a label, written in green copperplate. You read:
"Open if you dare"
A joke? You open the box. But it isn't a joke. Inside is It.
Yes, inside is the Perfect Philosophy, a bullet-proof understanding. Life, the Universe and Everything finally Sorted Out, explained with crystal clarity.
You think about it from every angle. It's perfect, flawless, everything you've been searching for. You look at the label again, and laugh. What a gift!
But a shadow crosses your thoughts. What now?
It is as though you have been given the most intricate knowledge. By analogy a perfect understanding of music, say of playing the violin; but you know that if you picked up that instrument, your hands would not have the ability to render a single tune. The gap between your knowledge and your skill has suddenly grown, an immense abyss has opened up, the chasm between preaching and practising.
Is this the beginnings of something wonderful, or of a prolonged and monstrous torture?
Would you dare?
1228#t1437
The only torture is the error as rhetoric (by audience) of your virtually continuous "naturally human" mental disorder (the psychiatry of your subjectivity) first, then the dialectic of likewise your psychic zombie self-deception and only then the logic of your psychologically junkie fallacy, that you are so utterly ignorant to begin with, you are next to nothing. The persistent torture of a continuously blank slate to barely, shamefully etch.
1228#t1502
The music, the instrument, the player, which is it, subject-or-object in understanding of It? Triad of confusion.
1228#t1504
It, continuous patent for technocratic mysticism.
