• View
• Edit
• History
• Print

0908
Is the dismantling of religion and transreligion (psychologism) satanic?

REALLY. IS IT POINT-I THAT IS SATANIC?

Habits etc., what Jordan Peterson calls "beliefs."

Is Ronald Green's existence nothing, i.e., denied as ALL unknown, as invariably absent, namely not only the absence of something, but the absence of everything, which is nothing?

If so this, here and now, the standing personalized point, is not even a single abstract reference point, or seme (sign), but is the thing itself, i.e., Word, not in any existential sense but a point, which is what point-i is. And not any explored (known) territory vs. unexplored (unknown) territory to be mediated.

Traditionally such necessary mediation's mediator was Word corrupt as a living entity, namely as the mythological archetype, the Divine Son and vengeful adversary as more than just an intersubjective field of things, but as the real forum for ultimately violent action, the whole persisting as the euphemism, "natural change." Darwin's Origin of the Species and the popularization of a changing nature as "evolution" was its massive escalation.

Hence, in the 21st century Word corrupt (with its ever further regression as the supposedly real progress) is a dispersed and nebulous conspiratorial process commonly promoting the tearfully babbling psyche, a soul beseeched to utter prostration with gossip and snitching. And the collective secularized transman of artificial intelligence cybernetics, psychologism is its overseer.

So what exactly in this escalating transhuman chaos logically following in the violent footsteps of the fallenness of man is the satanic? Is it anything not striking one's fancy?

0941
Everything is a nebulous storm of conspiracy, of deeply prostrate cybernetic gossiping and snitching.

Of course it rings with cheerful psychobabble. Psychobabble is its facilitation.

1003
Everything is what it is, and is right or wrong only as the explanation "existence."