• View
• Edit
• History
• Print

0749
Word is Point-i: that everything is word

"Word-meaning as such" is not meaning. It is the point that everything is words, therefore everything is word, which is not that word consists of words. If existence (x) were the point then it would. It is not.

"X-meaning" is nonword word. X is "existence." If existence were the logical ground that would "mean" that words are everything in that known and unknown world, i.e., since it is all that is in existence or is existence.

Word is symbol devoid of any existential explanation and is therefore not sign or entention, i.e., reference of and standing for (in the place of) something other than itself, or subject to the notion that it functions whatsoever [to make things work, to overcome the error of 'being', by virtue of its inner character-x, chronic reference to what-is-absent (x) from the point]. It is the thing itself. It is point-i.

0812
The thing itself (das Ding an sich)

Symbol devoid of the explanation "existence" is not the product of a three-tier process, i.e., Peirce: icon, index and symbol.

It is the phenomenon that without exception is the noumenon, the thing itself.

I said the above about 7 years ago, i.e., that everything is "nomenon." Or simply "word."

0831
Unlike point-i, nominalism maintains the awfulness (bullshit) and awesomeness (swoon), existence.

That everything is nomenon (word, the phenomenon that is the thing itself: the noumenon) is exactly not nominalism, namely that the physical or abstract is mere words [that function].

1037
Why epistemological consilience and reconciliation are utter metastasis

ANY KNEEJERK OPPOSITION TO THIS IS X-IGNORANCE OF THE X-COMPLEXITY OF THE X-ERROR, "EXISTENCE."

Point-i is the idea that constructive anything, is like "construct" the error "existence" and its derivative of attrition "agency."

Construct is the creation of the world of the commons and necessarily chronically invokes its opposite, "destruction" because it is what is fake, and therefore has to constantly shift to be overcome.

1050
Higher derivatives are not magic.
They're derivatives.

1110
The Zuckerberg-Chan initiative is the error force metastasizing

The explanation force for the derivative, "acceleration" and higher derivatives, in the most general sense (not only physical), is the error power and control.

So, I absolutely cringe at Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan, given their wealth (and status) probably also financially, seemingly infiltrating the conservative leadership of the UFC as typical of their supposedly progressive empowerment approach.

I know they mean only well, but what they're doing with the cybernetic-algorithm influence of the virtual metaverse targeting the real metaverse is sensationally fine-graining (blissfully reconstructing by deconstructing) neo-collectivistic social control as reality.

Word in [heroic and adversarial] action is ultimately the total disintegration of word (everything, phenomenon-as-noumenon), to absolute cancellation, i.e., to x, nulled, crossed out.

1130
Artificial intelligence is invariably the 2nd tier seduction of man already fallen as human.

1158
Jordan Peterson is crying because his face is flat against the wall of x-contradiction.

And his wife is petrified and convinced that somehow her husband (his mind impossibly trying to encompass the world, i.e., Mind) is the problem.