< 0215 | 0216 | 0217 >

Is the cancer that is word on fire more about the picture (why/ how) and less about the point (what)?

The ontology, epistemology and philosophy of semiotics are the error existence

The questions why and how (about something beyond the point what it is) are the error existence. Existence consists of the ontology, epistemology and philosophy of semiotics, whether iconic (pictorial), indexical (theoretical) or symbolic (meaningful). In such bullshit icon, index and symbol are all symbol, i.e., meaning (agency, namely the function of the word, in any variation of its subject/object existence, explaining word).

Icon, index and symbol are first, second and third order duplicities

Icon is open to camouflage as the first order error that it is mere reference to existence. Index and symbol likewise as mere meaning (of what exists) are intricately open to a plethora of second and third order duplicities.

Object permanence necessitates bottomless metastatic duplicity

The questions why and how are confirmations of the duplicitous geometries of the error existence. Object permanence is the error necessitating the duplicities of junkie fallacy, zombie self-deception and criminal mental order that ultimately is bottomless metastasis, whether it is icon, index or symbol.