If x, is everything a mutherfucking joke? Like pharmakon...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmakon_(philosophy)

"Adrian Mróz, a Polish-American philosopher and musician, analyses its application to art and argues that pharmakon is any physical, mental, or behavioral object which can cut (techne). In other words, pharmaka are agential and responsible for changes in consciousness"

"Existence" is the inversion of what reality is by how and why it is

Absement is not absence from the origin but is the absence of the origin

The idea that it is absence from the origin, is the error "existence," namely the inversion of the origin as mere sign, where the origin is word.

Word, i.e., in relative terms, geometric origin is utterly absent from "existence"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absement#Higher_integrals

Reality in terms of integration and differentiation, as "existence" render things utterly absent from what they are, namely word, which from the perspective of such error of integration/differentiation as existential reality would be the origin.

For instance in the normal and natural world of "existence" the time-integral of displacement is absement and the time derivative of absement is displacement. No origin. The origin is missing, awol. Anything that "exists" is thereby by inversion of reality, unity-displaced from what it is. The paradox of all "earthly" mayhem is that everything "exists" in total absence from meaning.

Ronald Green says existential reality is the objects AND nothingness (the spaces between them) of our sensory perception and that no thing is now but always in terms of memory of the past. In contrast, point-i is the idea that everything is symbolic meaning, i.e., that everything is word, and utterly not as mere sign. Existence literally is its impossible deconstruction, with word to absolute metastasis (meta infinity) relegated to "human understanding" as nothingness as if it is holy. Which if it continues its path of being normalized and naturalized by the scapegoating of humanity for the error that it is—as "human" fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder—will be the absence of everything, i.e., Nothing.

"Existence" is word-meaning displaced for the autocratic sensationalism of deconstruction.

I.e., not for what something is, but for why and how something is which is as if by inversion exactly not what it is.

Existence is the magical trick of antagonistically bigoted fundamentalism by which what everything is, is sensational, for it is thereby also everything. It is the holy or the sacred and everyone's version of it is jealously brutally different.

"Nothing is impossible to define" is denial that Nothing is what "existence" is.

The more existence is holy at the expense of word thereby mere token, the more it establishes the opposite of itself, namely total death. I.e., "everlasting life."