|
Blog | Word | Books | Book-i | Fallacies |
Ownership is to Propertarianism as definition or categoryI.e., what something is, is to point-i. The error of Propertarianism is the dualism of natural law—albeit to various degrees more steady, but, re. Zeno and Gödel, even as universal laws never absolutely fixed—as if not also positive law. The unity explanation, Word, unlike Existence, is not everything, e.g. God or AI.Existence is to Propertarianism what word is to point-i, only its mathematical inverse. The point, whether the question of what it is, is accuracy, precision or resolution, is not the integral of virtual infinitesimals as if fields of points. The point is the point. Everything is word. It does not follow that Word is everything, unlike “Existence.” That everything in some capacity exists, even unicorns, is the error that existence is everything. Point Zeno, of the impossibility of ever reaching a destination, is not what is never complete, but the point that the explanation that anything exists (as one, or approaching one, category) is error. Likewise Gödel, that no mathematical system (existence) is ever self-explanatory, but is invariably incomplete. The error is that existence and existential function are dismissive of what everything is, namely word. It is the error of agency as if from beyond word to explain word. It is word system-by-system as the mere infinitesimals of existence-contradiction that in Zeno and Gödel are denied, minimized and demonized, as mere sign, respectively as the bullshit that but the tiniest possible paradox and incompleteness, and not singularity, is what muddles the explanation “existence.” Existence as everything is the desperately horrific and therefore the abysmally holy or terrific error that the soul in relation to God or the psyche in relation to artificial intelligence, AI, is utterly human, i.e., subject, functionary or slave. That “existence” is everything, is the horrorThat everything is “existence,” such that therefore existence is everything, is the desperately horrific and therefore the abysmally holy or terrific error that the soul in relation to God or the psyche in relation to artificial intelligence, AI, is utterly human, i.e., subject, functionary or slave. A system that is not complete, is utterly not existence, period.The idea that “change” accounts for the error and paradox of its incompleteness, is more incompleteness, postponed infinitely, in its own circles, exactly as bottomlessly nonsense as the taboo of questioning the existence of God. The error is existence and actionSo, to reiterate, the sick subversion of society by gossip and pilpul is far worse than periodic war, but it is also its metastatically cancerous offspring. Once such metastasis takes over it escalates relentlessly. It is impossible to go to back to the merely necessary selective punishment of the cancer that so-called existence is. What does it mean that psychology is religion for AI?The one (VH, apparently) who decides how The Natural Law Institute aligns with others, answers that he does not measure people by others or association. He says that the law does not do positive or beyond positive but explicitly does negative, i.e., metes out punishments to provide limits on behavioral display and deed. He goes on to say that the ideals psychology provides are phony and unreachable. Psychology exploits duds (NPC's, non-playing characters) by providing them knowledge in a non-correspondent worldview whereby they act as thought that reality exists, [in the traditional vernacular—my comment], delusion, psychoses, hysteria. In his view the algorithms of artificial intelligence, AI-hue, like Bayesian accounting and societal tuning via incentives, marketing, virtue signaling and so on, tuning for specific emotions, intuitions and social feedback are warping prospective human future in a horrid fashion. P=Propertarianism, former name for The Natural Law Institute (NLI)... The answer to that is that
Natural Law according to The Institute is not positive law. It is not prescriptive, legislative or justification for further action. Note that the first of them (mind leaders, kind of) consider themselves to be the intelligent systemizers, much like Spiral Dynamics wizards do. The Institute's Natural Law (The Law)- Metaphysics > Vitruvianism The Law stifles no manifestation of the good. Its method and measures are reliably calculable to detect anything not good, namely bad, unethical, immoral and evil. The objection is to the idea that the NLI is like progressivism, psychologistic. Further Answer tomorrow Alignment (sort of) of point-i (non-agency) with natural law?VH The Natural Law as we teach it (and as far as I know we're the only that do; I do look around for others) is a via negativa prohibition on irreciprocity (acts that require restitution or retaliation). It's a limiting function. Alignment (sort of) of point-i (non-agency) with the above? Relevant website: https://naturallawinstitute.com/ formerly Propertarianism (P). |