Artificial intelligence, metastasis.

Quote, Vito Hayes :

[That rights are God-given or Natural is life-corrupting nonsense]

Life is natural; you just don't have a right to it. Who is a child to plead there case to for their life? Cause it is a special plea; they can't care for themselves; they have no right to life other than what the social fabric (mother, father, etc.) provide.

I'm making a differentiation to remove people from the fog of incoherence and the frame of begging (special pleading). Rights can only be provided by reciprocal insurance of obligation(s). They can't be gifted by nature nor God; but they must be produced by agents and dutifully defended; they aren't free and they can't be gifted for free without degradation.

We forbear in offering rights to those who can't produce them through their development; but it's a development in the ability to steward those rights for others through fulfilling duties that require agency.

Consider everything in the phenomenon, “now” as word.

As “existence” such word is everywhere and always not even a point. The idea that it functions to exist as the entention, “sign” referencing things that “actually exist” not now, not this, is psychological denial, which is fallacy. The logic of such “psyche” is that it is the complex or dynamic soul.

That anything (physically or abstractly) “exists” is in matter or spirit the metaphysical construct, “agency.”

The perpetuation of the bullshit belief items, “agency” and “existence” is the burning need to contract on “laws” and “limits” about how much anything “lives,” i.e., “does so,” or “not.”

The logical second-phase end of the word-corruption of word as secondary, or mere “meaning” in reference to “agency” and “existence” is artificial intelligence.

Personal obligations governed by different levels of intelligent stewardship are reasonable emergency measures while we use mere machines or mechanism to help each other steer the inner weaving of the social fabric of the corruption (intermittently reset by punishment or war) that the constructs “agency” and “existence” are.

But, how do we account for the deep fake technocracy, fake for it is beyond the purview of any man, of the exponentially vanishing regress of algorithm by artificial intelligence cybernetics? How do we normalize and naturalize the supposedly dynamic soul that “the psyche” is, to the next phase of “agency” in the corruption of man by “human intelligence,” other than by next-phase metastatic bullshit like the “global village” of a post-humanity tearfully in awe of their plight of empowerment in the utter prostration of being, “together?”

We sacredly eulogize it and its now systemically castrated former, already corrupt or fallen “human” leadership, by the abysmally mendacious holiness that it is, as “moving forward” and “dynamic.”