That word is anything other than word, is x

What is Russell's paradox?

That word is meaning is the x-simile, "word is like meaning"

Everything is word, so meaning is word

Point-i is the idea that all meaning is distinct, i.e., word.

Not exactly, albeit, yes, as purely existential explanation. Point-i is the idea that all meaning is distinct, i.e., word, so the aboutness of word is semantics as word-denial. The proposed change is what is semantics.

That word = meaning is fallacy. Re. 100% Coherence

Therefore all of a sudden all of point-i.net is wrong because everything is meaning and not word, and word has been relegated to "distinct meaning," thereby adding "indistinct meaning" to what everything is!

Not that it resolves the error of the notion that word=meaning. So, it follows that the change to "everything is meaning" is [the introduction of] some kind of chaos (psychological confusion, i.e., word-denial).

Progressivism = next phase dynamics, i.e., AI with chaos = order.