0640
Contrariness by useful fallacy, self-deception and mental disorder is the abyss
The perspective of perspectives of the same things as "existence" (x) with agency (AI—Agent I) is not logically inconsistent with the theory that it itself could be fundamentally wrong.
Unfortunately, x or AI is the ultimate sensationalism. It is by its own chronic subjective contrariness outside* and inside** currently sensationally escalating*** to solid metastasis of force power and control (fpc), that point-i must be nonsense.
Point-i is the proposition that existence and agency are word in contradictory**** explanation of being (nonword) now running itself into a wall.
* outside as intersubjective field
** inside as intrasubjective field
*** sensational escalation as the breathless emergencies of the error that its fundamental perspective is, which is metastasis
****contradiction sacralized as third eye paradox in Eastern philosophy, and as natural synthesis in Western philosophy.
0733
That the new is the old also explained as existence is x (wrong) and AI (I, agency, ouroboros)
0759
The new is the old also explained as the error existence is the error space or time.
0928
The errors existence and agency in terms of (the errors) "Work" and "Capacitance"
Charge (Q) Experiencing vs. Producing (the field).
1. Charge (Q) Experiencing the field
Work — potential V, work W, charge Q
Electric charge is the physical property of matter that causes some thus charged matter to experience a force when placed in an electromagnetic field
W=VQ, originally V=W/Q
If you have a test charge Q, and you want to move it from place-1 to place-2, and it takes an amount of work W to do it, then the potential (voltage) at place-2 is higher than that at place-1 by an amount V. The equation may make it may look like V depends on Q, but it does not: if you double the charge, it takes twice as much work to move it, and the V remains the same. The potential is a function of the pre-existing electric field, and the equation simply tells you how much work it takes to move a given amount of charge around in that field.—answered Jan 12, 2018 at 19:46 by Ben51 at physics.stackexchange
2. Charge (Q) Producing the field
Capacitance — charge Q, capacitance C, potential V
A capacitor is a device that stores electrical energy in an electric field. It is a passive electronic component with two terminals.
C=Q/V, originally Q=CV
The potential difference across a capacitor is proportional to the amount of charge on each plate of the capacitor, and defines the capacitance, C as the constant of proportionality. It is much less general than the first equation: there are many situations where the concept of capacitance is not applicable. Moreover, the charge referred to in the equation is the charge that produces the field, not one that experiences it.—answered Jan 12, 2018 at 19:46 Ben51 at physics.stackexchange
The constant of proportionality is the ratio that relates two given values in what is known as a proportional relationship. Other names for the constant of proportionality include the constant ratio, constant rate, unit rate, constant of variation, or even the rate of change.
0956
I will prove completely that "existence" is the fake explanation that is the mayhem
The exercise at 0928 above is some view of the error that we (in this case Q-personified) experience and produce stuff (supposedly intersubjective field)
The ultimate aim is to literally prove that length, time, mass, charge and temperature are utterly redundant collectivist nonsense, in the absolute contradiction of intersubjective existential utility itself, i.e., by what is chronically critical self-organizational confirmation-bias solidly 1. fallacy, 2. self-deception and 3. mental disorder.
I am not interested in participating in the scientific method, i.e., with collectivist empirical falsification. I will prove it in the mathematical sense, free from Gödel's criticism in terms of 'epistemological function'. I will prove it completely.
