< 1103 | 1104 | 1105 >

1100... Brainstorm

Existential fallacy is only illicit subalternation in the ontological sense, which is that in the formulation of something that exists, one can never describe it completely, which is the inverse of what existence is, namely that one cannot begin to describe it, for in terms of the absolute error of the concept "existence" there is nothing to describe.

0802
Re.1103#t2115
Advertising is junkie, zombie and crazie pharmakon

The mainstream media is fighting for progressive causes

The mainstream media is fighting for progressive causes in the sense that they're fighting for the accelerating renewal of reality as technocratic wizardry which most duplicitously is next-tier human development, namely cybernetic transhumanism (posthumanism).

0834
The mainstream media is abysmally progressive, i.e., artificial intelligence advertising-cybernetics.

0917
re. The Existential Fallacy

The existential fallacy is the first fallacy. The second fallacy is ad hominem, because of the terrible universality of the first fallacy.

So, how is the existential fallacy, essentially illicit subalternation, no mere theoretical or technical formality but universal across human and transhuman culture? Because existence is the contradictory nonword word explanation of word and the contradiction is invariably technological.

Invariably someone must be accountable for the mayhem that the contradiction is, which is to be held accountable for the inability and personal confusion to habitually lie, i.e., to deconstruct-and-construct normal and natural.

1153
That anything is beyond description, is the unity bullshit that anything is description

A silly witticism of the sacred intersubjective field of farce-together is the syllogism that one cannot begin to describe some thereby partially sacred existence, not because of some never smaller than infinitesimal incompleteness of deep inference that words are insufficient but because existence and thereby description are the unity contradiction, increasingly excused as the technicality, mansplaining in the description of the sacred intersection as beyond description.