Point-i is no compromise with "existence"

Point-i is not axiological, teleological or soteriological. It is not *about* anything, least of all "the self."

Point-i is no compromise with the abysmal explanation, "existence," of what 'now' as 'how' and 'why' is not 'now' but 'then'.

Point-i is not Atman or Maya. It is nothing like Atman-Brahman one or dual, ultimate reality, i.e., the metastatically binding compromise of authoritarian meaning by fascinating facilitation of magic spells cast, with existence.

202208030957

Casting, to do, to facilitate meta, like a rock

The casting is to do, to (re)set bones or to put (in its place), facere, to facilitate (by authoritarian-esoteric mystical magic).

202208030914

Permanence and transience are existential ideas

202208031225

The dog craze is the subversion, AI.

AI is twittery or babble together

202208031400

Point-i is not ideology. Its audience is irrelevant.

202208031422

Word/body, meaning/spirit, man/soul

re. 1. Point-i is the not existence trinity: word, meaning, man 2. Prasthanatrayi is the pseudo existence trinity: Upanishads, Brahma Sutras, Bhaghavad Gita 3. Christianity is the existence trinity: The Son, The Holy Spirit, The Father

Question, what is the id, ego and superego?