< 0517 | 0518 | 0519 >

The universally fundamentalistic bigotry of Natural Law (The Law)

I think the first (most intelligent thought leaders) of The Natural Law Institute would welcome agreement that if there are (exist) empirically demonstrable errors in its method and measures and its constitution in terms of its Natural Law (existence, The Law) itself, they ought to be found.

I am not sure agreement would be welcome that any such error could be found that are totally self-incriminating of “existence,” i.e., incriminating natural law itself, and if so that The Institute, and the institution of any social justice must be dismantled and replaced.

The speculation of what incriminates The Law.

For such error in total damnation of natural(negative) and positive law I have had and continue to have in mind the endlessly slippery fundamentalistic dualism necessarily as universal bigotry of 1) existence and 2) science.

The problem and mayhem(battle or struggle) of existence and science is the so-called “human” ego, and natural law, i.e., “humanity” is man set up as fallen(id) and naturally fallible, and lately with artificial intelligence truly utterly condemned.

It is man set up as a “humanity” so insanely beset by so-called trouble and struggle that only delusions of grandeur and conceit overcome it. The central delusion is that its own “first” superego intelligence about “existence” explains word as not what everything is, but as the abysmally fallible words of a “humanity” like a convict escaped, to its inopportune death subject to the intelligence of the first… but even more, by algorithm, as the artificial intelligence, as (empowered by) the latter’s “psyche.”

Existence, science - nevertheless freely interchangeably as or about the nearly completely hidden fields at any inevitably one time yet about all times, and the immediate conceptualization and embodiment individual or collective of such fields as the subject-or-object of the wise or the ignorant psyche(id, ego, superego).

The self-deception of The Law

The quotes are from the conclusion of Neel Burton's book, Hide and Seek, The Psychology of Self-Deception.

The self-deceptions are psychologism :
"When a superior intellect and a psychopathic temperament coalesce ... in the same individual, we have the best possible condition for the kind of effective genius that gets into the biographical dictionaries. ….

From the responses that they collated, Mullins-Sweatt and her colleagues found that the successful psychopath matched the unsuccessful one in all respects but one, namely, conscientiousness."*

So, the relevant point for Natural Law idealism is that the setup of existence with the necessary self-deception as what “humans,” i.e., “persons” do or have, is not mere self-deception psychology. The fallacious and outright psychopathic algorithmic conscientiousness of the so-called psyche (like the soul, fallacy language) and the so-called mind (like the spirit, mental language) support such psychology.

* Conscientiousness as if reciprocity The functional triad of junkie fallacy, zombie self-deception and mental mind is more than mere psychology. It is the new "together," i.e., the intersubjective field of psychologism.