Existence is the most fundamental autocratic* mysticism

“Kierkegaard takes doubt as a starting point for ‘existence’.”—Ronald Green

Autocracy is narcissistic esotericism posing as wizardry. However, that it is someone's fault, is the error existence as *agency*.

Existence is the error, “about,” namely that words are about not-word word.

Existence is the error, “about,” namely that words are about not word words, and that not word words are about word. It is the error of finding some kind of mean of aboutness, i.e., “meaning,” most importantly not that [it is what it is], but must be about its existence, namely its paradoxical natural infinity meta (im) structure, as “function” or “change,” the megalithic x-factor of its supposed superfluidity and therefore the inverted infinitesimal (infinity) of the “hidden” integral of its existential nature.

The only stupidity is that it is man's (man defined as "human") stupidity.

The only stupidity is that such stupidity is not the error existence, but is man's (defined as "human") stupidity.

Existence is the error that word is everything

Existence (x), whether animate or not, is the error that everything is conceived by someone, someone human or by its constitution, super-humanly meta.

Error x is the error, agency. And the bullshit goes deeper than mere obviously “human” conception. If everything is word, even non-word, it is as agent, namely someone, that it must be someone’s fundamentalistic belief, i.e., the belief that word must be God-like and be everything.

Existence is the error, “about,” namely that words are about not word words, and that not word words are about word. It is the error of finding some kind of mean of aboutness, i.e., “meaning,” most importantly not that [it is what it is], but must be about its existence, namely its paradoxical natural infinity meta (im) structure, as “function” or “change,” the megalithic x-factor of its superfluidity and therefore the inverted infinitesimal (infinity) of the “hidden” integral of its existential nature.

So, the error that “everything is word” must also *mean* “word is everything” includes the greater error of aboutness (existence) that it means at all. Furthermore, even as [an agent] just entertaining the question of its existence as the nature (how or why) of its existence must also *not mean* “word is everything.” Any humoring of the question existence at all invokes an agent, meaning that it means anything whatsoever to such agent, however deeply or complexly mystically related to its affirmative form, which is the most bigoted “constructive” fundamentalism, the [existential fallacy] of [begging the question], by set theory and holonism (everything is a part and a whole).

It is what it is is only error and holy farce as the chronic metastatic megalith existence