Object-oriented ontology (ooo) is necessarily x, i.e., agentive.

Existence is necessarily agentive. "A is B" is not agentive. It is not object-oriented ontology. It is word-word. That it is word is not the ambiguous, vague or holy paradoxical farce of who in the infinite supposed pneuma the agent is.

Pneuma: in Ancient Greece the element from which all else originates, not word, or even power, but whatever has or does power.

In the Eastern nothingness-mindfulness paradox enlightenment, pneuma is everything, i.e., the infinite ocean.

As for Curt Doolittle's Propertarianism, of an ideal commons generated and maintained by honest speech in ecstatic equilibrium punctuated by love and war is much less chaotic than the whimpering equilibrium of criminal empowerment by newspeak gossip. The New World Order is to Propertarianism as metastasis is to cancer, or as error X, in prison-vernacular, like the fucked is to the fucker.

From 20220406#toc-7...Is a theory of everything equal to what everything is?

A theory of everything = what everything is. The idea that word is everything is not the theory of everything.

A theory of everything (x) = the pneuma that everything is.

The idea that word is everything (logically following from "everything is word," in x) is that it is pneuma.Re. 20220407#toc-1 immediately above.

The TOC is a physics term: all about action. And Einstein's relentless search for it.

The TOC is explicitly a metaverse of what that only the bullshit questions why and how interstitch and underlie. Infinitely.