|
Blog | Word | Books | Book-i | Fallacies |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmakon_(philosophy)
1217#t0930 GRAVITAS The colloquially formal/informal explanation of gravity (or gravitas, substance) as interchangeably “power,” “work” and “force” in or as spacetime is a first example of the relevant contradiction that is the poppycock (swooning bullshit, sensationalism). INDOCTRINATION PARADING AS NEWS IS POPPYCOCK INTEGRATION As a result of the archetype mythology of production and consumption of poppycock the newsmedia are approaching the artificial singularity (artifice) of fake news, i.e., deepfake. THE PSYCHE IS THE PHARMACEUTICS OF SPACETIME THEATER “Existence” (x) maintains as the foggy Cartesian theater of “the psyche” for “human” to wholesomely become “transhuman” — in terms of psychology and even more acutely in terms of psychiatry. The psyche is the soul (1st tier poppycock) deconstructed and reconstructed (2nd tier poppycock) in or as the intersubjective field — the newfangled model of an objectively “hidden” mechanistic self-controlled universe — i.e., the infinity meta avatar. CYBERNETICS IS THE INTERACTIVE OBJECT-AS-SUBJECT The intersubjective process (cybernetics) is a deepfake game (players and playing field). It persists as process by denial that it is system and thereby denial that system is point, e.g., “now.” DEEPFAKE IDEALISM, AS POPPYCOCK X ACCUSED OF MEMETICS, LABELS THE MEME A SIMPLISTIC MERE HUMAN SIGN The cybernetic x exists vanishingly in OR wholly as the holey/holy paradox of esoteric wizardly opportunism for “being” locally memetic (loco, farcical) as both infinitesimal flatland perceptions in/of AND as/of the infinite magic-emergence of the object as subject. *
1217#t1000 A is B is memetic iff existence (x) The objection to memetics as a human simplification error of semiotics is x-preconceptual, i.e., entensive to the new poppycock that the mayhem that being labeled “human” is insufficiently sensational. To maximize the poppycock the target of the pharmakon must be “transhuman.”
1217#t1115 The contentious concepts of Pharmakon, as are those of God, albeit those of God are not yet metastasis, are symptoms of the creative (existent & agentive) Word as-everything yet contradictorily as its own tool, mere word, but nothing — as the awfully awesome mysterious unknown, explicitly not the word that everything is — but some knowable or unknowable Cartesian theater beyond what-it-is (word), meta-infinitely open to brutally contentious explanations in terms of existence (x), i.e., The Word (esoteric and authoritarian) of that, how and why everything-is.
1217#t1133 |