1225#t0700
Psychologism http://psychologism.net
Everything is word.
Existence is the error that things and persons exist and thereby that someone is or has The Word.
Psychologism is a neologism relabeling psychology in exposure of its subject, “the psyche” as the super-bigoted fundamentalism of “transhuman” existentialism, as “the soul” is the bigoted fundamentalism that man exists, e.g., that man has knowledge of good and evil (the tree of life), or is “human” i.e., human existentialism.
The psyche as human self-deception, psychology as human fallacy and psychiatry as human mental disorder are
- to religious sensibility the conceit of parading as the secular analysis of the soul and
- to secular sensibility the wonder of the deconstructive dismantling of humanity and their religious souls as the cancer on the face of Mother Earth.
The psyche is the super-delusion of complex progressivism that The Word is next-tier technocratic wizardry, i.e., cybernetics, the creative mental processes of a more “integral” self-organizational psychologistical synthesis. The confirmation is that the first corruption of man has not been enough. Being human is not enough (to utterly destroy man). Real man is not even human but transhuman. The psyche is not animism, but certainly animism's abysmal scorched-earth atavistic repurposing as fluid (hydraulic) systemic confusion.
Thus The Word (the final word, worse than any dysgenic as-if eugenic final solution) of next-tier technocratic meta-infinite wizardry is the new “existence” construct in terms of nonword words (not only symbol, but also icon and index), whereby language (symbol or word, small caps) is not word, but mere words next to The Word.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/117470683884
1225#t0800
The non-zero margin of error at 11d and beyond is the singularity-induction problem.
IT IS THE ERROR OF CALLING ANYTHING "THE UNIVERSE"
That at 11d (or nd) the margins of error are many orders smaller than at ordinary 4d spacetime but never 0, is the infinity of turtles down problem of Zeno's paradox, Russell's paradox and Gödel's uncertainty.
The problem is that definite dynamic form at any dimensionality is qualitatively integral.* Existence, no matter how far cosmologically, ontologically or epistemologically deductively "known" and thus logically, dialectically or rhetorically "argued," is the induction of normal and natural in or by the belief, "existence."
* qualitative integration of things: by the sensationalistic awesomeness or awfulness at and about their "existence"
1227#t0800
Transhumanism is the Abyss of AI Singularity — TranshumanismAISingularityAbyss
The error that the digital (deductively quantized) is or is not analog (inductively stochastic), e.g., that molecules are or are not fluid is the error that things functionally constitute each other (interactively deductively valid/sound like money and inductively strong/cogent like power, in any proportion of necessity and sufficiency but never absolute zero or unity).
The error of kinematics, but especially as dynamics (beyond word so as to be The Word in some such sense) is a swooning-bullshit show, as its own obfuscation as utter error in the sensationalism or ecstasy of logic, dialectics and rhetoric ultimately infinitely meta. With spirit: “human” soul or “transhuman” psyche.
The paradox is the error of the distinction whatsoever between deduction and induction, for instance, between the physical and the metaphysical. The error is the idea of agency, including the agents of cybernetics, like the so-called differentiator, or even the implicit agency of “the self” in “self-organization.” Artificial intelligence singularity, akin to nothingness.
1227#t1238 from 1227#t0800 above
Roland Mann
Pierre Rousseau There are no distinctions to be made in an analogue context.
1228#t0734
Roland Mann No, everything is word. That making or not or induction (context) is the issue, is the error that things are distinguished as The (Unspeakable) Word or in the context of Its supposed differentiation.
What things are is exactly what they are, as word. They are not after the fact that, how or why they are, even if That is unmentionable, i.e., that we cannot make distinctions in the context of its context.
1228#t0744
The ultimate horror is that as archetype mythology extensively, intensively and entensively (as supposed sign) in terms of words as if on matters beyond words, artificial intelligence (2nd tier error) has usurped The Word (made flesh, 1st tier error), but not in a religious sense at all, but as the ultimate disease, metastasis or trans-everything.
1228#t0747
Or the cybernetic judgment of all men. Literally the time of the Orc.
1228#t0759
So, the only thing that is wrong is that man has chronically been accused as the self-fulfilling prophecy of being but human. And by such complete error he is now the disease and by the long march through the institutions centered in establishing violence in children seduced by virtual reality games, has no choice to blissfully become transhuman, i.e., dead.
1228#t0816
The further cosmological (if existence) context beyond the apparently analog context is not indistinguishable. But it is turtles all the way down, (the nonsense, “infinity”). Thad Roberts also absorbs such further seductive induction as negligible measurement error made deduction in physics by digitally (deductively) concluding with 11 dimensions instead of 4. Whenever we name anything measured, we are naming the supposedly unmeasurable analog implied within it.
1228#t1006
Roland Mann
Pierre Rousseau, Well that depends on what 'Word' means.
To me 'Word' implies some kind of sameness, and thus has no place at all in an analogue; but could very well be considered a basic requirement in a digital format, in the same sense as a bit rate.
1228#t1012
Roland Mann, “Word,” as in “The Word” is the idea that “the analogue” as if “beyond words” determines “the digital,” that it determines distinct things not as what everything is (that they are word), but as mere words.
1228#t1015
I suspect that when I say that everything is word, you think of it in an ontological sense, that well, if everything is word it follows that I am claiming that word is everything. It is the projective inversion of the idea that the analogue is beyond distinction, and the reason is that the error is sheer linguistics, including the chronic scapegoating that man as but human is responsible for it.
1228#t1017
I wrote "analogue" in recognition of your English bent.
1228#t1021
So AI cybernetics in effect is the error that some unspeakable "Authority" (The Word), and The Word is with Him, albeit perfectly secularly dispersed throughout, cybernetically is a kind of super in all directions ministry of truth.
1228#t1022
Again the resultant hyper-metaphysics is not religious. It is abysmally just words, but in utter denial of it.
1228#t1023
Artificial intelligence IS the nonsense The Psyche.
1228#t1039
Same and different are things (words). It is as qualities of things that they are error that has to be allocated in personifications who if they are a person or persons have to thereby be scapegoated.
1228#t1044
Thus, (as the error that the logic, dialectic and rhetoric that, how and why any A is, is) artificial intelligence and The Psyche are the same swooning bullshit.
1228#t1112
When this was The Investigation (now Point-i), the conclusion was that everything is a continuum, a phenomenon but in a secondary sense most closely defined as somehow a fluid dynamic, or more accurately a fluid kinematic. However, it soon became clear that any kind of agency is the error of (being) nonword word.
1228#t1118
Is there some "differentiating something" for want of a word, behind what anything is (as distinction in but not as the continuum) persisting due to some unknowable quality of the continuum?
1228#t1119
About 7 years ago you called it "the differentiator."
1228#t1401
An analogue is something comparable to another in terms of some kind of differentiator unknowable in terms of words or thought. "A is B" (what A is) is thereby eliminated. Yet, that any A is B (as the common category that B already is, that very instance) is the very thing that symbol is, which is what everything is, i.e., word... wrongly "meaning," because meaning is referential or ententional, i.e., sign or semiotic.
1228#t1402
The idea that that implies that word is everything, is the impossible position for any "human" man to have unless he goes speechlessly trans, as the new New Age "Practice," namely mastery over Unspeakable Authority, i.e., artificial intelligence, The Psyche, and The Word.
1228#t1403
"Word" is that which we would have, had we been able to grok the truly mere "human"-word transcendent iconic or indexical analogue.
